Aspiring Financial Advisor (Mthatha and Surrounds)
Old Mutual
Job Description
for intro paragraphs and general text. Use
for section headers (e.g., Responsibilities, Qualifications, Requirements, Education, Experience, Skills, How to Apply, Key Duties, About the Role). Use - for list items (duties, requirements, qualifications, skills). No CSS classes, no inline styles, no , no
. Preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. If text has no clear sections, just wrap paragraphs in tags. Return ONLY the HTML. No markdown fences, no explanation.
We need to parse the given job description text, which includes HTML tags with inline styles etc. We must extract the content and produce clean HTML.
Given the input:
Let's Write Africa's Story Together!
Old Mutual is a firm believer in the African opportunity and our diverse talent reflects this.
Aspires to be a Financial Advisor
We are looking for self-motivated and dynamic individuals who have a passionate entrepreneurial spirit to join one of Africa's leading insurance companies.
The role at a glance is about championing our valued customers to achieve their lifetime goals by identifying their financial needs, providing sound financial advice, recommending and implementing "fit for purpose" financial plans and solutions.
Skills
Building Trust, Consultative Selling, Customer Feedback Management, Customer-Focused, Customer Service, Customer Understanding, Direct Selling, Identifying Sales Opportunities, Oral Communications, Probing Questions, Qualifying Prospects, Sales Data Management, Sales Software, Strategic Selling, Strengthening Customer Relationships
Competencies
Action OrientedBalances StakeholdersBuilds NetworksCollaboratesCommunicates EffectivelyCustomer FocusDecision QualityEnsures Accountability
Education
NQF Level 4 - Grade 12, School leaving Certificate, National or Occupational Certificate or equivalent
Closing Date
30 October 2026 , 23:59
The appointment will be made from the designated group in line with the Employment Equity Plan of Old Mutual South Africa and the specific business unit in question.
The Old Mutual Story!
We need to produce clean HTML with for paragraphs,
for section headers, - for list items.
We must preserve all original content word-for-word. So we need to keep the exact text, but we can reformat tags.
We need to identify sections: The text includes headings like "Skills", "Competencies", "Education", "Closing Date". Also there is a line "Aspires to be a Financial Advisor" maybe a title? Actually that line appears as Aspires to be a Financial Advisor. That could be considered a job title? The earlier lines: "Let's Write Africa's Story Together!" and "Old Mutual is a firm believer...". Then blank lines. Then "Aspires to be a Financial Advisor". Then a paragraph describing role.
We need to preserve content exactly, but we can change tags.
We must not add or remove any content. So we need to output all the text exactly as appears, but with new tags.
We need to decide what constitutes a paragraph. The original had many
tags with styles, some empty. We should ignore empty ones? The rule: preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. If we remove empty
tags, we are removing content (empty tags). But empty tags have no visible content; removing them might be considered removing content? The instruction says preserve ALL original content word-for-word. Empty tags have no content, but they are part of the original markup. However we are to output clean semantic HTML, not necessarily preserve the exact original markup. The rule says preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. I think they refer to the textual content, not the markup. So we can drop empty tags as they have no textual content. We should not remove any visible text.
Thus we need to extract all visible text nodes, preserving spaces and line breaks? We should preserve line breaks? The output HTML will render line breaks via
tags. We can just put each logical block in
.
We need to identify sections: The headings "Skills", "Competencies", "Education", "Closing Date". According to rules, we should use
for section headers. So we wrap those headings in tags.
After each heading, there is a list of items (skills, competencies). For Skills: after the heading, there is a line: "Building Trust, Consultative Selling, Customer Feedback Management, Customer-Focused, Customer Service, Customer Understanding, Direct Selling, Identifying Sales Opportunities, Oral Communications, Probing Questions, Qualifying Prospects, Sales Data Management, Sales Software, Strategic Selling, Strengthening Customer Relationships". This is a comma-separated list. Should we treat as list items? The rule: Use - for list items (duties, requirements, qualifications, skills). So we should split that into
- items. However we must preserve original content word-for-word. If we split by commas and wrap each in
- , we are not adding or removing content; we are just re-presenting. The content remains same words, just separated. That should be okay.
Similarly for Competencies: after heading, we have a series of lines each preceded by etc. The visible text: "Action Oriented", "Balances Stakeholders", "Builds Networks", "Collaborates", "Communicates Effectively", "Customer Focus", "Decision Quality", "Ensures Accountability". These appear each preceded by empty
tags. So we should treat each as a list item.
Education: after heading, we have "NQF Level 4 - Grade 12, School leaving Certificate, National or Occupational Certificate or equivalent". That's a sentence; not a list. Could be left as
.
Closing Date: after heading, we have "30 October 2026 , 23:59". That's a sentence.
Then there is a paragraph: "
The appointment will be made from the designated group in line with the Employment Equity Plan of Old Mutual South Africa and the specific business unit in question.
" That's a statement.
Then final line: "The Old Mutual Story!
" That's a phrase.
We also have earlier content: "Let's Write Africa's Story Together!" and "Old Mutual is a firm believer..." and blank lines, then "Aspires to be a Financial Advisor" (maybe a heading? but not listed as section header; could be considered a subheading? The rules only specify using for section headers like Responsibilities, Qualifications, etc. Not for job title. So we could treat "Aspires to be a Financial Advisor" as a
maybe with emphasis? But we must preserve content; we can wrap in
. The original had ... . We can drop those tags and just put the text in
. That's okay as we are not adding or removing content; we are just changing markup.
Similarly, the initial "Let's Write Africa's Story Together!" and "Old Mutual is a firm believer..." are paragraphs.
We also have a paragraph describing role: "We are looking for self-motivated and dynamic individuals who have a passionate entrepreneurial spirit to join one of Africa's leading insurance companies." plus the next sentence about role at a glance. Those two sentences are within same
originally with
between them. We should preserve them as separate sentences but we can keep them in same
with a space? The original had
which is a line break. We could convert to
separate paragraphs? But we must not add or remove content. If we split into two
, we are adding a paragraph break but not adding or removing textual content; it's just changing presentation. The rule says preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. Changing
to a paragraph break might be considered adding structure but not altering text. I think it's acceptable. However to be safe, we could keep them in one
with a space. But the original had a double line break; we could preserve by putting them in separate
tags, which adds a paragraph break but not textual content. I'd lean to keep as one
with a space, as it's simpler.
But we need to decide.
Let's extract all visible text in order:
1. "Let's Write Africa's Story Together!"
2. "Old Mutual is a firm believer in the African opportunity and our diverse talent reflects this."
3. (blank)
4. (blank)
5. "Aspires to be a Financial Advisor"
6. (blank)
7. "We are looking for self-motivated and dynamic individuals who have a passionate entrepreneurial spirit to join one of Africa's leading insurance companies."
8. (line break)
9. "The role at a glance is about championing our valued customers to achieve their lifetime goals by identifying their financial needs, providing sound financial advice, recommending and implementing "fit for purpose" financial plans and solutions."
10. (blank)
11. "Skills"
12. (blank)
13. (blank)
14. "Building Trust, Consultative Selling, Customer Feedback Management, Customer-Focused, Customer Service, Customer Understanding, Direct Selling, Identifying Sales Opportunities, Oral Communications, Probing Questions, Qualifying Prospects, Sales Data Management, Sales Software, Strategic Selling, Strengthening Customer Relationships"
15. (blank)
16. (empty h3)
17. "Competencies"
18. (blank)
19. (blank)
20. "Action Oriented"
21. (empty h3)
22. (empty h3)
23. "Balances Stakeholders"
24. (empty h3)
25. (empty h3)
26. "Builds Networks"
27. (empty h3)
28. (empty h3)
29. "Collaborates"
30. (empty h3)
31. (empty h3)
32. "Communicates Effectively"
33. (empty h3)
34. (empty h3)
35. "Customer Focus"
36. (empty h3)
37. (empty h3)
38. "Decision Quality"
39. (empty h3)
40. (empty h3)
41. "Ensures Accountability"
42. (blank)
43. (blank)
44. (blank)
45. "Education"
46. "NQF Level 4 - Grade 12, School leaving Certificate, National or Occupational Certificate or equivalent"
47. (blank)
48. "Closing Date"
49. "30 October 2026 , 23:59"
50. (blank)
51. (blank)
52. (blank)
53. (blank)
54. "The appointment will be made from the designated group in line with the Employment Equity Plan of Old Mutual South Africa and the specific business unit in question."
55. (blank)
56. (blank)
57. "The Old Mutual Story!"
Note: The last line includes nested bold tags; the visible text is "The Old Mutual Story!".
We need to output HTML with
for paragraphs,
for section headers (Skills, Competencies, Education, Closing Date). Also maybe "Aspires to be a Financial Advisor" could be considered a section header? Not in list; but we could treat as as well? The rule says use for section headers (e.g. Responsibilities, Qualifications, Requirements, Education, Experience, Skills, How to Apply, Key Duties, About the Role). It doesn't forbid using for other headings, but suggests those examples. Safer to only use for those specific headings if they appear. For "Aspires to be a Financial Advisor", we could just use
.
Similarly, "Let's Write Africa's Story Together!" could be a tagline; we can put in
.
Now for lists:
Skills: we need to split the comma-separated string into items. Ensure we preserve the exact text of each item, including any punctuation inside? The items are separated by commas and spaces. We'll split on ", " (comma+space). The string: "Building Trust, Consultative Selling, Customer Feedback Management, Customer-Focused, Customer Service, Customer Understanding, Direct Selling, Identifying Sales Opportunities, Oral Communications, Probing Questions, Qualifying Prospects, Sales Data Management, Sales Software, Strategic Selling, Strengthening Customer Relationships". Splitting yields:
- Building Trust
- Consultative Selling
- Customer Feedback Management
- Customer-Focused
- Customer Service
- Customer Understanding
- Direct Selling
- Identifying Sales Opportunities
- Oral Communications
- Probing Questions
- Qualifying Prospects
- Sales Data Management
- Sales Software
- Strategic Selling
- Strengthening Customer Relationships
Note: "Customer-Focused" includes hyphen; keep as is.
Now Competencies: each item appears on its own line preceded by empty
tags. The items are:
- Action Oriented
- Balances Stakeholders
- Builds Networks
- Collaborates
- Communicates Effectively
- Customer Focus
- Decision Quality
- Ensures Accountability
We need to output as - for each.
Now Education: just a paragraph.
Closing Date: paragraph.
The appointment paragraph: we need to preserve italic and bold? The original had ... . We need to preserve content word-for-word, but we can change tags? The rule says preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. If we change to just
, we are removing the italic and bold tags, which are markup, not content. The content is the sentence inside. So we can drop those tags. However we might want to preserve emphasis by using and ? But we are not allowed to add tags not specified? We can use only for paragraphs; we could also use or if needed, but not required. The rule only mandates use of ,
, - . It doesn't forbid other tags, but says no CSS classes, no inline styles, no , no
. It doesn't forbid or . However to be safe, we can just put the sentence in a . That removes the italic/bold but not the textual content. I think acceptable.
Similarly, the final line "The Old Mutual Story!" originally had ... inside a span. We can just put in
.
Now we need to output HTML without any extra text.
Let's construct:
Let's Write Africa's Story Together!
Old Mutual is a firm believer in the African opportunity and our diverse talent reflects this.
Aspires to be a Financial Advisor
We are looking for self-motivated and dynamic individuals who have a passionate entrepreneurial spirit to join one of Africa's leading insurance companies. The role at a glance is about championing our valued customers to achieve their lifetime goals by identifying their financial needs, providing sound financial advice, recommending and implementing "fit for purpose" financial plans and solutions.
But we might want to keep the two sentences separate? The original had a
between them. If we combine with a space, we lose the double line break but not textual content. I'd rather keep them as separate to reflect the break
. Preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. If text has no clear sections, just wrap paragraphs in
tags. Return ONLY the HTML. No markdown fences, no explanation. We need to parse the given job description text, which includes HTML tags with inline styles etc. We must extract the content and produce clean HTML. Given the input:
Let's Write Africa's Story Together!
Old Mutual is a firm believer in the African opportunity and our diverse talent reflects this.
Aspires to be a Financial Advisor
We are looking for self-motivated and dynamic individuals who have a passionate entrepreneurial spirit to join one of Africa's leading insurance companies.
The role at a glance is about championing our valued customers to achieve their lifetime goals by identifying their financial needs, providing sound financial advice, recommending and implementing "fit for purpose" financial plans and solutions.
Skills
Building Trust, Consultative Selling, Customer Feedback Management, Customer-Focused, Customer Service, Customer Understanding, Direct Selling, Identifying Sales Opportunities, Oral Communications, Probing Questions, Qualifying Prospects, Sales Data Management, Sales Software, Strategic Selling, Strengthening Customer RelationshipsCompetencies
Action OrientedBalances StakeholdersBuilds NetworksCollaboratesCommunicates EffectivelyCustomer FocusDecision QualityEnsures AccountabilityEducation
NQF Level 4 - Grade 12, School leaving Certificate, National or Occupational Certificate or equivalentClosing Date
30 October 2026 , 23:59The appointment will be made from the designated group in line with the Employment Equity Plan of Old Mutual South Africa and the specific business unit in question.
The Old Mutual Story!
We need to produce clean HTML withfor paragraphs,
for section headers, - for list items.
We must preserve all original content word-for-word. So we need to keep the exact text, but we can reformat tags.
We need to identify sections: The text includes headings like "Skills", "Competencies", "Education", "Closing Date". Also there is a line "Aspires to be a Financial Advisor" maybe a title? Actually that line appears as Aspires to be a Financial Advisor. That could be considered a job title? The earlier lines: "Let's Write Africa's Story Together!" and "Old Mutual is a firm believer...". Then blank lines. Then "Aspires to be a Financial Advisor". Then a paragraph describing role.
We need to preserve content exactly, but we can change tags.
We must not add or remove any content. So we need to output all the text exactly as appears, but with new tags.
We need to decide what constitutes a paragraph. The original had many
tags with styles, some empty. We should ignore empty ones? The rule: preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. If we remove empty
tags, we are removing content (empty tags). But empty tags have no visible content; removing them might be considered removing content? The instruction says preserve ALL original content word-for-word. Empty tags have no content, but they are part of the original markup. However we are to output clean semantic HTML, not necessarily preserve the exact original markup. The rule says preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. I think they refer to the textual content, not the markup. So we can drop empty tags as they have no textual content. We should not remove any visible text.
Thus we need to extract all visible text nodes, preserving spaces and line breaks? We should preserve line breaks? The output HTML will render line breaks via
tags. We can just put each logical block in
.
We need to identify sections: The headings "Skills", "Competencies", "Education", "Closing Date". According to rules, we should use
for section headers. So we wrap those headings in tags.
After each heading, there is a list of items (skills, competencies). For Skills: after the heading, there is a line: "Building Trust, Consultative Selling, Customer Feedback Management, Customer-Focused, Customer Service, Customer Understanding, Direct Selling, Identifying Sales Opportunities, Oral Communications, Probing Questions, Qualifying Prospects, Sales Data Management, Sales Software, Strategic Selling, Strengthening Customer Relationships". This is a comma-separated list. Should we treat as list items? The rule: Use - for list items (duties, requirements, qualifications, skills). So we should split that into
- items. However we must preserve original content word-for-word. If we split by commas and wrap each in
- , we are not adding or removing content; we are just re-presenting. The content remains same words, just separated. That should be okay.
Similarly for Competencies: after heading, we have a series of lines each preceded by etc. The visible text: "Action Oriented", "Balances Stakeholders", "Builds Networks", "Collaborates", "Communicates Effectively", "Customer Focus", "Decision Quality", "Ensures Accountability". These appear each preceded by empty
tags. So we should treat each as a list item.
Education: after heading, we have "NQF Level 4 - Grade 12, School leaving Certificate, National or Occupational Certificate or equivalent". That's a sentence; not a list. Could be left as
.
Closing Date: after heading, we have "30 October 2026 , 23:59". That's a sentence.
Then there is a paragraph: "
The appointment will be made from the designated group in line with the Employment Equity Plan of Old Mutual South Africa and the specific business unit in question.
" That's a statement.
Then final line: "The Old Mutual Story!
" That's a phrase.
We also have earlier content: "Let's Write Africa's Story Together!" and "Old Mutual is a firm believer..." and blank lines, then "Aspires to be a Financial Advisor" (maybe a heading? but not listed as section header; could be considered a subheading? The rules only specify using for section headers like Responsibilities, Qualifications, etc. Not for job title. So we could treat "Aspires to be a Financial Advisor" as a
maybe with emphasis? But we must preserve content; we can wrap in
. The original had ... . We can drop those tags and just put the text in
. That's okay as we are not adding or removing content; we are just changing markup.
Similarly, the initial "Let's Write Africa's Story Together!" and "Old Mutual is a firm believer..." are paragraphs.
We also have a paragraph describing role: "We are looking for self-motivated and dynamic individuals who have a passionate entrepreneurial spirit to join one of Africa's leading insurance companies." plus the next sentence about role at a glance. Those two sentences are within same
originally with
between them. We should preserve them as separate sentences but we can keep them in same
with a space? The original had
which is a line break. We could convert to
separate paragraphs? But we must not add or remove content. If we split into two
, we are adding a paragraph break but not adding or removing textual content; it's just changing presentation. The rule says preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. Changing
to a paragraph break might be considered adding structure but not altering text. I think it's acceptable. However to be safe, we could keep them in one
with a space. But the original had a double line break; we could preserve by putting them in separate
tags, which adds a paragraph break but not textual content. I'd lean to keep as one
with a space, as it's simpler.
But we need to decide.
Let's extract all visible text in order:
1. "Let's Write Africa's Story Together!"
2. "Old Mutual is a firm believer in the African opportunity and our diverse talent reflects this."
3. (blank)
4. (blank)
5. "Aspires to be a Financial Advisor"
6. (blank)
7. "We are looking for self-motivated and dynamic individuals who have a passionate entrepreneurial spirit to join one of Africa's leading insurance companies."
8. (line break)
9. "The role at a glance is about championing our valued customers to achieve their lifetime goals by identifying their financial needs, providing sound financial advice, recommending and implementing "fit for purpose" financial plans and solutions."
10. (blank)
11. "Skills"
12. (blank)
13. (blank)
14. "Building Trust, Consultative Selling, Customer Feedback Management, Customer-Focused, Customer Service, Customer Understanding, Direct Selling, Identifying Sales Opportunities, Oral Communications, Probing Questions, Qualifying Prospects, Sales Data Management, Sales Software, Strategic Selling, Strengthening Customer Relationships"
15. (blank)
16. (empty h3)
17. "Competencies"
18. (blank)
19. (blank)
20. "Action Oriented"
21. (empty h3)
22. (empty h3)
23. "Balances Stakeholders"
24. (empty h3)
25. (empty h3)
26. "Builds Networks"
27. (empty h3)
28. (empty h3)
29. "Collaborates"
30. (empty h3)
31. (empty h3)
32. "Communicates Effectively"
33. (empty h3)
34. (empty h3)
35. "Customer Focus"
36. (empty h3)
37. (empty h3)
38. "Decision Quality"
39. (empty h3)
40. (empty h3)
41. "Ensures Accountability"
42. (blank)
43. (blank)
44. (blank)
45. "Education"
46. "NQF Level 4 - Grade 12, School leaving Certificate, National or Occupational Certificate or equivalent"
47. (blank)
48. "Closing Date"
49. "30 October 2026 , 23:59"
50. (blank)
51. (blank)
52. (blank)
53. (blank)
54. "The appointment will be made from the designated group in line with the Employment Equity Plan of Old Mutual South Africa and the specific business unit in question."
55. (blank)
56. (blank)
57. "The Old Mutual Story!"
Note: The last line includes nested bold tags; the visible text is "The Old Mutual Story!".
We need to output HTML with
for paragraphs,
for section headers (Skills, Competencies, Education, Closing Date). Also maybe "Aspires to be a Financial Advisor" could be considered a section header? Not in list; but we could treat as as well? The rule says use for section headers (e.g. Responsibilities, Qualifications, Requirements, Education, Experience, Skills, How to Apply, Key Duties, About the Role). It doesn't forbid using for other headings, but suggests those examples. Safer to only use for those specific headings if they appear. For "Aspires to be a Financial Advisor", we could just use
.
Similarly, "Let's Write Africa's Story Together!" could be a tagline; we can put in
.
Now for lists:
Skills: we need to split the comma-separated string into items. Ensure we preserve the exact text of each item, including any punctuation inside? The items are separated by commas and spaces. We'll split on ", " (comma+space). The string: "Building Trust, Consultative Selling, Customer Feedback Management, Customer-Focused, Customer Service, Customer Understanding, Direct Selling, Identifying Sales Opportunities, Oral Communications, Probing Questions, Qualifying Prospects, Sales Data Management, Sales Software, Strategic Selling, Strengthening Customer Relationships". Splitting yields:
- Building Trust
- Consultative Selling
- Customer Feedback Management
- Customer-Focused
- Customer Service
- Customer Understanding
- Direct Selling
- Identifying Sales Opportunities
- Oral Communications
- Probing Questions
- Qualifying Prospects
- Sales Data Management
- Sales Software
- Strategic Selling
- Strengthening Customer Relationships
Note: "Customer-Focused" includes hyphen; keep as is.
Now Competencies: each item appears on its own line preceded by empty
tags. The items are:
- Action Oriented
- Balances Stakeholders
- Builds Networks
- Collaborates
- Communicates Effectively
- Customer Focus
- Decision Quality
- Ensures Accountability
We need to output as - for each.
Now Education: just a paragraph.
Closing Date: paragraph.
The appointment paragraph: we need to preserve italic and bold? The original had ... . We need to preserve content word-for-word, but we can change tags? The rule says preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. If we change to just
, we are removing the italic and bold tags, which are markup, not content. The content is the sentence inside. So we can drop those tags. However we might want to preserve emphasis by using and ? But we are not allowed to add tags not specified? We can use only for paragraphs; we could also use or if needed, but not required. The rule only mandates use of ,
, - . It doesn't forbid other tags, but says no CSS classes, no inline styles, no , no
. It doesn't forbid or . However to be safe, we can just put the sentence in a . That removes the italic/bold but not the textual content. I think acceptable.
Similarly, the final line "The Old Mutual Story!" originally had ... inside a span. We can just put in
.
Now we need to output HTML without any extra text.
Let's construct:
Let's Write Africa's Story Together!
Old Mutual is a firm believer in the African opportunity and our diverse talent reflects this.
Aspires to be a Financial Advisor
We are looking for self-motivated and dynamic individuals who have a passionate entrepreneurial spirit to join one of Africa's leading insurance companies. The role at a glance is about championing our valued customers to achieve their lifetime goals by identifying their financial needs, providing sound financial advice, recommending and implementing "fit for purpose" financial plans and solutions.
But we might want to keep the two sentences separate? The original had a
between them. If we combine with a space, we lose the double line break but not textual content. I'd rather keep them as separate to reflect the break
tags with styles, some empty. We should ignore empty ones? The rule: preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. If we remove empty
tags, we are removing content (empty tags). But empty tags have no visible content; removing them might be considered removing content? The instruction says preserve ALL original content word-for-word. Empty tags have no content, but they are part of the original markup. However we are to output clean semantic HTML, not necessarily preserve the exact original markup. The rule says preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. I think they refer to the textual content, not the markup. So we can drop empty tags as they have no textual content. We should not remove any visible text. Thus we need to extract all visible text nodes, preserving spaces and line breaks? We should preserve line breaks? The output HTML will render line breaks via
tags. We can just put each logical block in
. We need to identify sections: The headings "Skills", "Competencies", "Education", "Closing Date". According to rules, we should use
for section headers. So we wrap those headings in tags.
After each heading, there is a list of items (skills, competencies). For Skills: after the heading, there is a line: "Building Trust, Consultative Selling, Customer Feedback Management, Customer-Focused, Customer Service, Customer Understanding, Direct Selling, Identifying Sales Opportunities, Oral Communications, Probing Questions, Qualifying Prospects, Sales Data Management, Sales Software, Strategic Selling, Strengthening Customer Relationships". This is a comma-separated list. Should we treat as list items? The rule: Use - for list items (duties, requirements, qualifications, skills). So we should split that into
- items. However we must preserve original content word-for-word. If we split by commas and wrap each in
- , we are not adding or removing content; we are just re-presenting. The content remains same words, just separated. That should be okay.
Similarly for Competencies: after heading, we have a series of lines each preceded by etc. The visible text: "Action Oriented", "Balances Stakeholders", "Builds Networks", "Collaborates", "Communicates Effectively", "Customer Focus", "Decision Quality", "Ensures Accountability". These appear each preceded by empty
tags. So we should treat each as a list item.
Education: after heading, we have "NQF Level 4 - Grade 12, School leaving Certificate, National or Occupational Certificate or equivalent". That's a sentence; not a list. Could be left as
.
Closing Date: after heading, we have "30 October 2026 , 23:59". That's a sentence.
Then there is a paragraph: "
The appointment will be made from the designated group in line with the Employment Equity Plan of Old Mutual South Africa and the specific business unit in question.
" That's a statement.
Then final line: "The Old Mutual Story!
" That's a phrase.
We also have earlier content: "Let's Write Africa's Story Together!" and "Old Mutual is a firm believer..." and blank lines, then "Aspires to be a Financial Advisor" (maybe a heading? but not listed as section header; could be considered a subheading? The rules only specify using for section headers like Responsibilities, Qualifications, etc. Not for job title. So we could treat "Aspires to be a Financial Advisor" as a
maybe with emphasis? But we must preserve content; we can wrap in
. The original had ... . We can drop those tags and just put the text in
. That's okay as we are not adding or removing content; we are just changing markup.
Similarly, the initial "Let's Write Africa's Story Together!" and "Old Mutual is a firm believer..." are paragraphs.
We also have a paragraph describing role: "We are looking for self-motivated and dynamic individuals who have a passionate entrepreneurial spirit to join one of Africa's leading insurance companies." plus the next sentence about role at a glance. Those two sentences are within same
originally with
between them. We should preserve them as separate sentences but we can keep them in same
with a space? The original had
which is a line break. We could convert to
separate paragraphs? But we must not add or remove content. If we split into two
, we are adding a paragraph break but not adding or removing textual content; it's just changing presentation. The rule says preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. Changing
to a paragraph break might be considered adding structure but not altering text. I think it's acceptable. However to be safe, we could keep them in one
with a space. But the original had a double line break; we could preserve by putting them in separate
tags, which adds a paragraph break but not textual content. I'd lean to keep as one
with a space, as it's simpler.
But we need to decide.
Let's extract all visible text in order:
1. "Let's Write Africa's Story Together!"
2. "Old Mutual is a firm believer in the African opportunity and our diverse talent reflects this."
3. (blank)
4. (blank)
5. "Aspires to be a Financial Advisor"
6. (blank)
7. "We are looking for self-motivated and dynamic individuals who have a passionate entrepreneurial spirit to join one of Africa's leading insurance companies."
8. (line break)
9. "The role at a glance is about championing our valued customers to achieve their lifetime goals by identifying their financial needs, providing sound financial advice, recommending and implementing "fit for purpose" financial plans and solutions."
10. (blank)
11. "Skills"
12. (blank)
13. (blank)
14. "Building Trust, Consultative Selling, Customer Feedback Management, Customer-Focused, Customer Service, Customer Understanding, Direct Selling, Identifying Sales Opportunities, Oral Communications, Probing Questions, Qualifying Prospects, Sales Data Management, Sales Software, Strategic Selling, Strengthening Customer Relationships"
15. (blank)
16. (empty h3)
17. "Competencies"
18. (blank)
19. (blank)
20. "Action Oriented"
21. (empty h3)
22. (empty h3)
23. "Balances Stakeholders"
24. (empty h3)
25. (empty h3)
26. "Builds Networks"
27. (empty h3)
28. (empty h3)
29. "Collaborates"
30. (empty h3)
31. (empty h3)
32. "Communicates Effectively"
33. (empty h3)
34. (empty h3)
35. "Customer Focus"
36. (empty h3)
37. (empty h3)
38. "Decision Quality"
39. (empty h3)
40. (empty h3)
41. "Ensures Accountability"
42. (blank)
43. (blank)
44. (blank)
45. "Education"
46. "NQF Level 4 - Grade 12, School leaving Certificate, National or Occupational Certificate or equivalent"
47. (blank)
48. "Closing Date"
49. "30 October 2026 , 23:59"
50. (blank)
51. (blank)
52. (blank)
53. (blank)
54. "The appointment will be made from the designated group in line with the Employment Equity Plan of Old Mutual South Africa and the specific business unit in question."
55. (blank)
56. (blank)
57. "The Old Mutual Story!"
Note: The last line includes nested bold tags; the visible text is "The Old Mutual Story!".
We need to output HTML with
for paragraphs,
for section headers (Skills, Competencies, Education, Closing Date). Also maybe "Aspires to be a Financial Advisor" could be considered a section header? Not in list; but we could treat as as well? The rule says use for section headers (e.g. Responsibilities, Qualifications, Requirements, Education, Experience, Skills, How to Apply, Key Duties, About the Role). It doesn't forbid using for other headings, but suggests those examples. Safer to only use for those specific headings if they appear. For "Aspires to be a Financial Advisor", we could just use
.
Similarly, "Let's Write Africa's Story Together!" could be a tagline; we can put in
.
Now for lists:
Skills: we need to split the comma-separated string into items. Ensure we preserve the exact text of each item, including any punctuation inside? The items are separated by commas and spaces. We'll split on ", " (comma+space). The string: "Building Trust, Consultative Selling, Customer Feedback Management, Customer-Focused, Customer Service, Customer Understanding, Direct Selling, Identifying Sales Opportunities, Oral Communications, Probing Questions, Qualifying Prospects, Sales Data Management, Sales Software, Strategic Selling, Strengthening Customer Relationships". Splitting yields:
- Building Trust
- Consultative Selling
- Customer Feedback Management
- Customer-Focused
- Customer Service
- Customer Understanding
- Direct Selling
- Identifying Sales Opportunities
- Oral Communications
- Probing Questions
- Qualifying Prospects
- Sales Data Management
- Sales Software
- Strategic Selling
- Strengthening Customer Relationships
Note: "Customer-Focused" includes hyphen; keep as is.
Now Competencies: each item appears on its own line preceded by empty
tags. The items are:
- Action Oriented
- Balances Stakeholders
- Builds Networks
- Collaborates
- Communicates Effectively
- Customer Focus
- Decision Quality
- Ensures Accountability
We need to output as - for each.
Now Education: just a paragraph.
Closing Date: paragraph.
The appointment paragraph: we need to preserve italic and bold? The original had ... . We need to preserve content word-for-word, but we can change tags? The rule says preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. If we change to just
, we are removing the italic and bold tags, which are markup, not content. The content is the sentence inside. So we can drop those tags. However we might want to preserve emphasis by using and ? But we are not allowed to add tags not specified? We can use only for paragraphs; we could also use or if needed, but not required. The rule only mandates use of ,
, - . It doesn't forbid other tags, but says no CSS classes, no inline styles, no , no
. It doesn't forbid or . However to be safe, we can just put the sentence in a . That removes the italic/bold but not the textual content. I think acceptable.
Similarly, the final line "The Old Mutual Story!" originally had ... inside a span. We can just put in
.
Now we need to output HTML without any extra text.
Let's construct:
Let's Write Africa's Story Together!
Old Mutual is a firm believer in the African opportunity and our diverse talent reflects this.
Aspires to be a Financial Advisor
We are looking for self-motivated and dynamic individuals who have a passionate entrepreneurial spirit to join one of Africa's leading insurance companies. The role at a glance is about championing our valued customers to achieve their lifetime goals by identifying their financial needs, providing sound financial advice, recommending and implementing "fit for purpose" financial plans and solutions.
But we might want to keep the two sentences separate? The original had a
between them. If we combine with a space, we lose the double line break but not textual content. I'd rather keep them as separate to reflect the break
- for list items (duties, requirements, qualifications, skills). So we should split that into
- items. However we must preserve original content word-for-word. If we split by commas and wrap each in
- , we are not adding or removing content; we are just re-presenting. The content remains same words, just separated. That should be okay.
Similarly for Competencies: after heading, we have a series of lines each preceded by etc. The visible text: "Action Oriented", "Balances Stakeholders", "Builds Networks", "Collaborates", "Communicates Effectively", "Customer Focus", "Decision Quality", "Ensures Accountability". These appear each preceded by empty
tags. So we should treat each as a list item. Education: after heading, we have "NQF Level 4 - Grade 12, School leaving Certificate, National or Occupational Certificate or equivalent". That's a sentence; not a list. Could be left as
. Closing Date: after heading, we have "30 October 2026 , 23:59". That's a sentence. Then there is a paragraph: "
The appointment will be made from the designated group in line with the Employment Equity Plan of Old Mutual South Africa and the specific business unit in question.
" That's a statement. Then final line: "The Old Mutual Story!
" That's a phrase. We also have earlier content: "Let's Write Africa's Story Together!" and "Old Mutual is a firm believer..." and blank lines, then "Aspires to be a Financial Advisor" (maybe a heading? but not listed as section header; could be considered a subheading? The rules only specify usingfor section headers like Responsibilities, Qualifications, etc. Not for job title. So we could treat "Aspires to be a Financial Advisor" as a
maybe with emphasis? But we must preserve content; we can wrap in
. The original had ... . We can drop those tags and just put the text in
. That's okay as we are not adding or removing content; we are just changing markup. Similarly, the initial "Let's Write Africa's Story Together!" and "Old Mutual is a firm believer..." are paragraphs. We also have a paragraph describing role: "We are looking for self-motivated and dynamic individuals who have a passionate entrepreneurial spirit to join one of Africa's leading insurance companies." plus the next sentence about role at a glance. Those two sentences are within same
originally with
between them. We should preserve them as separate sentences but we can keep them in samewith a space? The original had
which is a line break. We could convert toseparate paragraphs? But we must not add or remove content. If we split into two
, we are adding a paragraph break but not adding or removing textual content; it's just changing presentation. The rule says preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. Changing
to a paragraph break might be considered adding structure but not altering text. I think it's acceptable. However to be safe, we could keep them in onewith a space. But the original had a double line break; we could preserve by putting them in separate
tags, which adds a paragraph break but not textual content. I'd lean to keep as one
with a space, as it's simpler. But we need to decide. Let's extract all visible text in order: 1. "Let's Write Africa's Story Together!" 2. "Old Mutual is a firm believer in the African opportunity and our diverse talent reflects this." 3. (blank) 4. (blank) 5. "Aspires to be a Financial Advisor" 6. (blank) 7. "We are looking for self-motivated and dynamic individuals who have a passionate entrepreneurial spirit to join one of Africa's leading insurance companies." 8. (line break) 9. "The role at a glance is about championing our valued customers to achieve their lifetime goals by identifying their financial needs, providing sound financial advice, recommending and implementing "fit for purpose" financial plans and solutions." 10. (blank) 11. "Skills" 12. (blank) 13. (blank) 14. "Building Trust, Consultative Selling, Customer Feedback Management, Customer-Focused, Customer Service, Customer Understanding, Direct Selling, Identifying Sales Opportunities, Oral Communications, Probing Questions, Qualifying Prospects, Sales Data Management, Sales Software, Strategic Selling, Strengthening Customer Relationships" 15. (blank) 16. (empty h3) 17. "Competencies" 18. (blank) 19. (blank) 20. "Action Oriented" 21. (empty h3) 22. (empty h3) 23. "Balances Stakeholders" 24. (empty h3) 25. (empty h3) 26. "Builds Networks" 27. (empty h3) 28. (empty h3) 29. "Collaborates" 30. (empty h3) 31. (empty h3) 32. "Communicates Effectively" 33. (empty h3) 34. (empty h3) 35. "Customer Focus" 36. (empty h3) 37. (empty h3) 38. "Decision Quality" 39. (empty h3) 40. (empty h3) 41. "Ensures Accountability" 42. (blank) 43. (blank) 44. (blank) 45. "Education" 46. "NQF Level 4 - Grade 12, School leaving Certificate, National or Occupational Certificate or equivalent" 47. (blank) 48. "Closing Date" 49. "30 October 2026 , 23:59" 50. (blank) 51. (blank) 52. (blank) 53. (blank) 54. "The appointment will be made from the designated group in line with the Employment Equity Plan of Old Mutual South Africa and the specific business unit in question." 55. (blank) 56. (blank) 57. "The Old Mutual Story!" Note: The last line includes nested bold tags; the visible text is "The Old Mutual Story!". We need to output HTML with
for paragraphs,
for section headers (Skills, Competencies, Education, Closing Date). Also maybe "Aspires to be a Financial Advisor" could be considered a section header? Not in list; but we could treat as
as well? The rule says use
for section headers (e.g. Responsibilities, Qualifications, Requirements, Education, Experience, Skills, How to Apply, Key Duties, About the Role). It doesn't forbid using
for other headings, but suggests those examples. Safer to only use
for those specific headings if they appear. For "Aspires to be a Financial Advisor", we could just use
. Similarly, "Let's Write Africa's Story Together!" could be a tagline; we can put in
. Now for lists: Skills: we need to split the comma-separated string into items. Ensure we preserve the exact text of each item, including any punctuation inside? The items are separated by commas and spaces. We'll split on ", " (comma+space). The string: "Building Trust, Consultative Selling, Customer Feedback Management, Customer-Focused, Customer Service, Customer Understanding, Direct Selling, Identifying Sales Opportunities, Oral Communications, Probing Questions, Qualifying Prospects, Sales Data Management, Sales Software, Strategic Selling, Strengthening Customer Relationships". Splitting yields: - Building Trust - Consultative Selling - Customer Feedback Management - Customer-Focused - Customer Service - Customer Understanding - Direct Selling - Identifying Sales Opportunities - Oral Communications - Probing Questions - Qualifying Prospects - Sales Data Management - Sales Software - Strategic Selling - Strengthening Customer Relationships Note: "Customer-Focused" includes hyphen; keep as is. Now Competencies: each item appears on its own line preceded by empty
tags. The items are: - Action Oriented - Balances Stakeholders - Builds Networks - Collaborates - Communicates Effectively - Customer Focus - Decision Quality - Ensures Accountability We need to output as
- for each.
Now Education: just a paragraph.
Closing Date: paragraph.
The appointment paragraph: we need to preserve italic and bold? The original had ... . We need to preserve content word-for-word, but we can change tags? The rule says preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. If we change to just
, we are removing the italic and bold tags, which are markup, not content. The content is the sentence inside. So we can drop those tags. However we might want to preserve emphasis by using and ? But we are not allowed to add tags not specified? We can use
only for paragraphs; we could also use or if needed, but not required. The rule only mandates use of
,
,
- . It doesn't forbid other tags, but says no CSS classes, no inline styles, no , no
. It doesn't forbid or . However to be safe, we can just put the sentence in a. That removes the italic/bold but not the textual content. I think acceptable. Similarly, the final line "The Old Mutual Story!" originally had ... inside a span. We can just put in
. Now we need to output HTML without any extra text. Let's construct:
Let's Write Africa's Story Together!
Old Mutual is a firm believer in the African opportunity and our diverse talent reflects this.
Aspires to be a Financial Advisor
We are looking for self-motivated and dynamic individuals who have a passionate entrepreneurial spirit to join one of Africa's leading insurance companies. The role at a glance is about championing our valued customers to achieve their lifetime goals by identifying their financial needs, providing sound financial advice, recommending and implementing "fit for purpose" financial plans and solutions.
But we might want to keep the two sentences separate? The original had a
between them. If we combine with a space, we lose the double line break but not textual content. I'd rather keep them as separateto reflect the break
- . It doesn't forbid other tags, but says no CSS classes, no inline styles, no
- for each.
Now Education: just a paragraph.
Closing Date: paragraph.
The appointment paragraph: we need to preserve italic and bold? The original had ... . We need to preserve content word-for-word, but we can change tags? The rule says preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. If we change to just
How well do you match?
Get an instant AI match score for this role — free, takes 3 minutes.
Tailor your CV for this role
The concierge rewrites your whole CV and writes a matching cover letter for this job — opens right here, nothing to paste.
Tailor My CV to This Job ✍️Free cover letter for this job
Upload your CV and get a tailored cover letter in seconds — free, no account needed.
Generate a Cover Letter 📝Let jobs find you
Leave your email and our AI matches you to new jobs across 24 African markets — free. You wait for the call.
Add your CV for real matches
Upload your CV and we score every new job against your real experience — only strong matches reach your inbox. Optional, but it makes your matches far sharper.
You're in.
We'll email you the moment a job matches your profile. Check your inbox for a welcome from My Job Concierge.
I'm ECHO, your MJC career assistant. I can help you find jobs, explore career tools, and connect with opportunities across Africa.