Part Time Financial Adviser (Hillcrest, Bothas Hill, Assagay, Pinetown, New Germany)
Old Mutual
Job Description
for intro paragraphs and general text. Use
for section headers (e.g., Responsibilities, Qualifications, Requirements, Education, Experience, Skills, How to Apply, Key Duties, About the Role). Use - for list items (duties, requirements, qualifications, skills). No CSS classes, no inline styles, no , no
. Preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. If text has no clear sections, just wrap paragraphs in tags. Return ONLY the HTML.
We need to parse the given raw text (which includes HTML tags with styles etc). We need to extract the content and produce clean HTML.
Given the raw input:
Let's Write Africa's Story Together!
Old Mutual is a firm believer in the African opportunity and our diverse talent reflects this.
Part-time opportunity:
- Part-time Financial Adviser
- Grade 12
- Currently in an existing role which he or she wants to retain, but supplement value proposition and/or income by offering financial advice
- Access to in-segment market and existing network
- DOFA/Fit & proper
- A valid Driver’s licence and own car
- A clear criminal and credit check
- Proven computer literacy and digital dexterity
- Excellent communication skills (written and verbal)
- Sound planning and organising abilities
- Ability to collate, analyse and synthesize information
- Entrepreneurial mindset
- Sound business acumen
- GRIT, resilience and tenacity to stay the course.
- Sales orientation
Skills
Building Trust, Consultative Selling, Customer-Focused, Customer Service, Customer Understanding, Direct Selling, Identifying Sales Opportunities, Oral Communications, Probing Questions, Qualifying Prospects, Sales Data Management, Sales Software, Strategic Selling, Strengthening Customer Relationships
Competencies
Action OrientedBalances StakeholdersBuilds NetworksCollaboratesCommunicates EffectivelyCustomer FocusDrives ResultsEnsures Accountability
Education
NQF Level 4 - Grade 12, School leaving Certificate, National or Occupational Certificate or equivalent
Closing Date
30 October 2026 , 23:59
The appointment will be made from the designated group in line with the Employment Equity Plan of Old Mutual South Africa and the specific business unit in question.
The Old Mutual Story!
We need to produce clean HTML with for paragraphs,
for section headers, - for list items.
We must preserve all original content word-for-word. That means we cannot change the text, but we can reformat tags.
We need to identify sections: The content includes:
- Intro: "Let's Write Africa's Story Together!" (maybe heading)
- "Old Mutual is a firm believer in the African opportunity and our diverse talent reflects this."
- Then blank paragraphs.
- Then "Part-time opportunity:" followed by a list (ul with li items). The list items include: Part-time Financial Adviser, Grade 12, etc. Actually the first li "Part-time Financial Adviser" seems like job title? But it's inside the list under Part-time opportunity heading. We need to keep as list items.
- Then blank p.
- Then "Skills" heading, then blank p's, then a line of skills: "Building Trust, Consultative Selling, Customer-Focused, Customer Service, Customer Understanding, Direct Selling, Identifying Sales Opportunities, Oral Communications, Probing Questions, Qualifying Prospects, Sales Data Management, Sales Software, Strategic Selling, Strengthening Customer Relationships"
- Then an empty h3.
- Then "Competencies" heading, blank p's, then a series of competency words each followed by etc. The raw shows: "Action OrientedBalances StakeholdersBuilds NetworksCollaboratesCommunicates EffectivelyCustomer FocusDrives ResultsEnsures Accountability" So each competency appears then some empty h3 tags. We need to preserve content word-for-word, but we cannot keep the empty h3 tags? The rule says: Use
for section headers. No , no
. It didn't forbid other tags like but we should not keep empty tags? It says preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. That suggests we must keep the exact text, including the empty tags? However we are to output HTML, and we can decide to keep them? The instruction: "Return ONLY the HTML. No markdown fences, no explanation, no preamble." It didn't say we must strip out empty tags. But earlier: "Use for section headers (e.g. Responsibilities, Qualifications, Requirements, Education, Experience, Skills, How to Apply, Key Duties, About the Role)". It didn't say we cannot use other tags, but we should follow the instruction: Use
for introductory paragraphs and general text,
for section headers, - for list items. It didn't forbid other tags, but to be safe we should convert section headers to
and maybe keep other tags as
? However the rule "Preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase" conflicts with changing tags. If we change
to something else, we are removing original tags. But maybe they mean preserve the textual content, not the markup. Usually in such tasks, they want you to strip away styling and produce semantic HTML with appropriate tags, but keep the text unchanged. The phrase "Preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase" likely refers to the textual content, not the markup. So we can change tags as needed, but keep the text exactly.
Thus we need to extract the textual content and wrap in appropriate tags.
Let's extract the text pieces:
1. "Let's Write Africa's Story Together!" (note the HTML entity ' is apostrophe). We need to output the actual apostrophe? The original text includes ' which is HTML entity for apostrophe. Preserving word-for-word would keep '? Usually they'd want the actual character? But we can keep as is? The instruction says preserve original content word-for-word. The original content includes the entity '. So we should keep that exactly. However typical output would be the apostrophe. But to be safe, keep the entity.
2. "Old Mutual is a firm believer in the African opportunity and our diverse talent reflects this."
3. Then blank paragraphs (empty). We can ignore empty paragraphs? They are original content (empty). Should we preserve them? Probably we can ignore as they add no meaning. But preserving word-for-word would require empty tags. However we are to use for paragraphs; empty
would be okay but maybe we can omit them as they add no content. The rule "If text has no clear sections, just wrap paragraphs in
tags". Empty paragraphs could be considered paragraphs with no content; we could either keep them as
or drop them. I'd drop them to keep clean.
4. Then "Part-time opportunity:" This is a heading? Could be considered a section header. According to rules, we should use for section headers. So we wrap that text in Part-time opportunity:
. Keep the bold? The original had Part-time opportunity:. We should preserve the text "Part-time opportunity:" without the bold markup. So Part-time opportunity:
.
5. Then the list items: each
- content. We need to wrap the whole list in
- ... etc. The list items text:
- Part-time Financial Adviser
- Grade 12
- Currently in an existing role which he or she wants to retain, but supplement value proposition and/or income by offering financial advice
- Access to in-segment market and existing network
- DOFA/Fit & proper (note original had & which is HTML entity for &. We need to preserve that? The text "DOFA/Fit & proper". We'll keep the entity & as is.
- A valid Driver’s licence and own car (note the apostrophe in Driver’s is a curly apostrophe? We'll keep as is.)
- A clear criminal and credit check
- Proven computer literacy and digital dexterity
- Excellent communication skills (written and verbal)
- Sound planning and organising abilities
- Ability to collate, analyse and synthesize information
- Entrepreneurial mindset
- Sound business acumen
- GRIT, resilience and tenacity to stay the course.
- Sales orientation
We need to preserve exactly as given, including punctuation.
6. Then blank p.
7. Then "Skills" heading ->
Skills
8. Then blank p's.
9. Then the skills line: "Building Trust, Consultative Selling, Customer-Focused, Customer Service, Customer Understanding, Direct Selling, Identifying Sales Opportunities, Oral Communications, Probing Questions, Qualifying Prospects, Sales Data Management, Sales Software, Strategic Selling, Strengthening Customer Relationships"
We need to decide how to represent this. It's not a list; it's a sentence/comma-separated list. According to rules, we can wrap in as general text. So
Building Trust, Consultative Selling, Customer-Focused, Customer Service, Customer Understanding, Direct Selling, Identifying Sales Opportunities, Oral Communications, Probing Questions, Qualifying Prospects, Sales Data Management, Sales Software, Strategic Selling, Strengthening Customer Relationships
10. Then an empty . We can ignore as it's empty.
11. Then "Competencies" heading -> Competencies
12. Then blank p's.
13. Then the competencies text: It appears as a series of words each followed by empty tags. The text: "Action OrientedBalances StakeholdersBuilds NetworksCollaboratesCommunicates EffectivelyCustomer FocusDrives ResultsEnsures Accountability". So we need to output the text exactly, but we can strip the empty tags? If we preserve word-for-word, we must keep them. But they are empty tags; maybe we can keep them as . However the instruction says use for section headers, - for list items,
for paragraphs. It didn't forbid other tags, but we could keep them. However they are empty, so they'd produce nothing visually. Might be okay.
But maybe better to treat each competency as a list item? The original seems to be a list of competencies separated by empty h3 tags. Could be interpreted as each competency is a heading? But they used
as separators. Not clear.
Given the instruction to use for section headers and - for list items, we could treat the competencies as a list (
- Action Oriented
- Balances Stakeholders
... etc). That would be a reasonable semantic representation. However that would be adding structure (changing from original separators to list). The rule says preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. Changing the separators to list items is adding structure (though not adding or removing text). It's rephrasing? It's re-structuring but not changing text. Might be considered adding? Safer to keep the text as is, maybe wrap in and keep the empty
tags as they are. But the rule says no s, no
tags, but didn't forbid . So we could keep tags.
Thus after Competencies
, we could output the exact competency string: "Action OrientedBalances StakeholdersBuilds NetworksCollaboratesCommunicates EffectivelyCustomer FocusDrives ResultsEnsures Accountability". Then maybe a
after? Actually after that there is
etc. We'll just output that string as is, maybe inside a ? The original had that text directly after the blank p's, not inside a
tag? Let's see: after the blank p's, we have:
Competencies
Action OrientedBalances StakeholdersBuilds NetworksCollaboratesCommunicates EffectivelyCustomer FocusDrives ResultsEnsures Accountability
So the competency text is outside any tag, directly after the blank p's, then followed by a
. So we could wrap that competency text in a tag (as general text) and keep the inner
tags as they are. That would be adding a wrapper, which is allowed (we use
for paragraphs). It does not remove or add text, just adds a tag. That seems okay.
Thus we will output:
Action Oriented
Balances StakeholdersBuilds NetworksCollaboratesCommunicates EffectivelyCustomer FocusDrives ResultsEnsures Accountability
But note there is a trailing after the competency text. That's an empty p; we can ignore.
14. Then blank p's.
15. Then "Education" heading -> Education
16. Then the education line: "NQF Level 4 - Grade 12, School leaving Certificate, National or Occupational Certificate or equivalent". Note there are double spaces before "National". We'll preserve exactly.
Wrap in .
17. Then blank p.
18
Apply Now ↗
How well do you match?
Get an instant AI match score for this role — free, takes 3 minutes.
Tailor your CV for this role
The concierge rewrites your whole CV and writes a matching cover letter for this job — opens right here, nothing to paste.
Tailor My CV to This Job ✍️
Free cover letter for this job
Upload your CV and get a tailored cover letter in seconds — free, no account needed.
Generate a Cover Letter 📝
. Preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. If text has no clear sections, just wrap paragraphs in
tags. Return ONLY the HTML. We need to parse the given raw text (which includes HTML tags with styles etc). We need to extract the content and produce clean HTML. Given the raw input:
Let's Write Africa's Story Together!
Old Mutual is a firm believer in the African opportunity and our diverse talent reflects this.
Part-time opportunity:
- Part-time Financial Adviser
- Grade 12
- Currently in an existing role which he or she wants to retain, but supplement value proposition and/or income by offering financial advice
- Access to in-segment market and existing network
- DOFA/Fit & proper
- A valid Driver’s licence and own car
- A clear criminal and credit check
- Proven computer literacy and digital dexterity
- Excellent communication skills (written and verbal)
- Sound planning and organising abilities
- Ability to collate, analyse and synthesize information
- Entrepreneurial mindset
- Sound business acumen
- GRIT, resilience and tenacity to stay the course.
- Sales orientation
Skills
Building Trust, Consultative Selling, Customer-Focused, Customer Service, Customer Understanding, Direct Selling, Identifying Sales Opportunities, Oral Communications, Probing Questions, Qualifying Prospects, Sales Data Management, Sales Software, Strategic Selling, Strengthening Customer RelationshipsCompetencies
Action OrientedBalances StakeholdersBuilds NetworksCollaboratesCommunicates EffectivelyCustomer FocusDrives ResultsEnsures AccountabilityEducation
NQF Level 4 - Grade 12, School leaving Certificate, National or Occupational Certificate or equivalentClosing Date
30 October 2026 , 23:59The appointment will be made from the designated group in line with the Employment Equity Plan of Old Mutual South Africa and the specific business unit in question.
The Old Mutual Story!
We need to produce clean HTML withfor paragraphs,
for section headers, - for list items.
We must preserve all original content word-for-word. That means we cannot change the text, but we can reformat tags.
We need to identify sections: The content includes:
- Intro: "Let's Write Africa's Story Together!" (maybe heading)
- "Old Mutual is a firm believer in the African opportunity and our diverse talent reflects this."
- Then blank paragraphs.
- Then "Part-time opportunity:" followed by a list (ul with li items). The list items include: Part-time Financial Adviser, Grade 12, etc. Actually the first li "Part-time Financial Adviser" seems like job title? But it's inside the list under Part-time opportunity heading. We need to keep as list items.
- Then blank p.
- Then "Skills" heading, then blank p's, then a line of skills: "Building Trust, Consultative Selling, Customer-Focused, Customer Service, Customer Understanding, Direct Selling, Identifying Sales Opportunities, Oral Communications, Probing Questions, Qualifying Prospects, Sales Data Management, Sales Software, Strategic Selling, Strengthening Customer Relationships"
- Then an empty h3.
- Then "Competencies" heading, blank p's, then a series of competency words each followed by etc. The raw shows: "Action OrientedBalances StakeholdersBuilds NetworksCollaboratesCommunicates EffectivelyCustomer FocusDrives ResultsEnsures Accountability" So each competency appears then some empty h3 tags. We need to preserve content word-for-word, but we cannot keep the empty h3 tags? The rule says: Use
for section headers. No , no
. It didn't forbid other tags like but we should not keep empty tags? It says preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. That suggests we must keep the exact text, including the empty tags? However we are to output HTML, and we can decide to keep them? The instruction: "Return ONLY the HTML. No markdown fences, no explanation, no preamble." It didn't say we must strip out empty tags. But earlier: "Use for section headers (e.g. Responsibilities, Qualifications, Requirements, Education, Experience, Skills, How to Apply, Key Duties, About the Role)". It didn't say we cannot use other tags, but we should follow the instruction: Use
for introductory paragraphs and general text,
for section headers, - for list items. It didn't forbid other tags, but to be safe we should convert section headers to
and maybe keep other tags as
? However the rule "Preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase" conflicts with changing tags. If we change
to something else, we are removing original tags. But maybe they mean preserve the textual content, not the markup. Usually in such tasks, they want you to strip away styling and produce semantic HTML with appropriate tags, but keep the text unchanged. The phrase "Preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase" likely refers to the textual content, not the markup. So we can change tags as needed, but keep the text exactly.
Thus we need to extract the textual content and wrap in appropriate tags.
Let's extract the text pieces:
1. "Let's Write Africa's Story Together!" (note the HTML entity ' is apostrophe). We need to output the actual apostrophe? The original text includes ' which is HTML entity for apostrophe. Preserving word-for-word would keep '? Usually they'd want the actual character? But we can keep as is? The instruction says preserve original content word-for-word. The original content includes the entity '. So we should keep that exactly. However typical output would be the apostrophe. But to be safe, keep the entity.
2. "Old Mutual is a firm believer in the African opportunity and our diverse talent reflects this."
3. Then blank paragraphs (empty). We can ignore empty paragraphs? They are original content (empty). Should we preserve them? Probably we can ignore as they add no meaning. But preserving word-for-word would require empty tags. However we are to use for paragraphs; empty
would be okay but maybe we can omit them as they add no content. The rule "If text has no clear sections, just wrap paragraphs in
tags". Empty paragraphs could be considered paragraphs with no content; we could either keep them as
or drop them. I'd drop them to keep clean.
4. Then "Part-time opportunity:" This is a heading? Could be considered a section header. According to rules, we should use for section headers. So we wrap that text in Part-time opportunity:
. Keep the bold? The original had Part-time opportunity:. We should preserve the text "Part-time opportunity:" without the bold markup. So Part-time opportunity:
.
5. Then the list items: each
- content. We need to wrap the whole list in
- ... etc. The list items text:
- Part-time Financial Adviser
- Grade 12
- Currently in an existing role which he or she wants to retain, but supplement value proposition and/or income by offering financial advice
- Access to in-segment market and existing network
- DOFA/Fit & proper (note original had & which is HTML entity for &. We need to preserve that? The text "DOFA/Fit & proper". We'll keep the entity & as is.
- A valid Driver’s licence and own car (note the apostrophe in Driver’s is a curly apostrophe? We'll keep as is.)
- A clear criminal and credit check
- Proven computer literacy and digital dexterity
- Excellent communication skills (written and verbal)
- Sound planning and organising abilities
- Ability to collate, analyse and synthesize information
- Entrepreneurial mindset
- Sound business acumen
- GRIT, resilience and tenacity to stay the course.
- Sales orientation
We need to preserve exactly as given, including punctuation.
6. Then blank p.
7. Then "Skills" heading ->
Skills
8. Then blank p's.
9. Then the skills line: "Building Trust, Consultative Selling, Customer-Focused, Customer Service, Customer Understanding, Direct Selling, Identifying Sales Opportunities, Oral Communications, Probing Questions, Qualifying Prospects, Sales Data Management, Sales Software, Strategic Selling, Strengthening Customer Relationships"
We need to decide how to represent this. It's not a list; it's a sentence/comma-separated list. According to rules, we can wrap in as general text. So
Building Trust, Consultative Selling, Customer-Focused, Customer Service, Customer Understanding, Direct Selling, Identifying Sales Opportunities, Oral Communications, Probing Questions, Qualifying Prospects, Sales Data Management, Sales Software, Strategic Selling, Strengthening Customer Relationships
10. Then an empty . We can ignore as it's empty.
11. Then "Competencies" heading -> Competencies
12. Then blank p's.
13. Then the competencies text: It appears as a series of words each followed by empty tags. The text: "Action OrientedBalances StakeholdersBuilds NetworksCollaboratesCommunicates EffectivelyCustomer FocusDrives ResultsEnsures Accountability". So we need to output the text exactly, but we can strip the empty tags? If we preserve word-for-word, we must keep them. But they are empty tags; maybe we can keep them as . However the instruction says use for section headers, - for list items,
for paragraphs. It didn't forbid other tags, but we could keep them. However they are empty, so they'd produce nothing visually. Might be okay.
But maybe better to treat each competency as a list item? The original seems to be a list of competencies separated by empty h3 tags. Could be interpreted as each competency is a heading? But they used
as separators. Not clear.
Given the instruction to use for section headers and - for list items, we could treat the competencies as a list (
- Action Oriented
- Balances Stakeholders
... etc). That would be a reasonable semantic representation. However that would be adding structure (changing from original separators to list). The rule says preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. Changing the separators to list items is adding structure (though not adding or removing text). It's rephrasing? It's re-structuring but not changing text. Might be considered adding? Safer to keep the text as is, maybe wrap in and keep the empty
tags as they are. But the rule says no s, no
tags, but didn't forbid . So we could keep tags.
Thus after Competencies
, we could output the exact competency string: "Action OrientedBalances StakeholdersBuilds NetworksCollaboratesCommunicates EffectivelyCustomer FocusDrives ResultsEnsures Accountability". Then maybe a
after? Actually after that there is
etc. We'll just output that string as is, maybe inside a ? The original had that text directly after the blank p's, not inside a
tag? Let's see: after the blank p's, we have:
Competencies
Action OrientedBalances StakeholdersBuilds NetworksCollaboratesCommunicates EffectivelyCustomer FocusDrives ResultsEnsures Accountability
So the competency text is outside any tag, directly after the blank p's, then followed by a
. So we could wrap that competency text in a tag (as general text) and keep the inner
tags as they are. That would be adding a wrapper, which is allowed (we use
for paragraphs). It does not remove or add text, just adds a tag. That seems okay.
Thus we will output:
Action Oriented
Balances StakeholdersBuilds NetworksCollaboratesCommunicates EffectivelyCustomer FocusDrives ResultsEnsures Accountability
But note there is a trailing after the competency text. That's an empty p; we can ignore.
14. Then blank p's.
15. Then "Education" heading -> Education
16. Then the education line: "NQF Level 4 - Grade 12, School leaving Certificate, National or Occupational Certificate or equivalent". Note there are double spaces before "National". We'll preserve exactly.
Wrap in .
17. Then blank p.
18
for section headers. No , no
. It didn't forbid other tags like but we should not keep empty tags? It says preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. That suggests we must keep the exact text, including the empty tags? However we are to output HTML, and we can decide to keep them? The instruction: "Return ONLY the HTML. No markdown fences, no explanation, no preamble." It didn't say we must strip out empty tags. But earlier: "Use for section headers (e.g. Responsibilities, Qualifications, Requirements, Education, Experience, Skills, How to Apply, Key Duties, About the Role)". It didn't say we cannot use other tags, but we should follow the instruction: Use
for introductory paragraphs and general text,
for section headers, - for list items. It didn't forbid other tags, but to be safe we should convert section headers to
and maybe keep other tags as
? However the rule "Preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase" conflicts with changing tags. If we change
to something else, we are removing original tags. But maybe they mean preserve the textual content, not the markup. Usually in such tasks, they want you to strip away styling and produce semantic HTML with appropriate tags, but keep the text unchanged. The phrase "Preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase" likely refers to the textual content, not the markup. So we can change tags as needed, but keep the text exactly.
Thus we need to extract the textual content and wrap in appropriate tags.
Let's extract the text pieces:
1. "Let's Write Africa's Story Together!" (note the HTML entity ' is apostrophe). We need to output the actual apostrophe? The original text includes ' which is HTML entity for apostrophe. Preserving word-for-word would keep '? Usually they'd want the actual character? But we can keep as is? The instruction says preserve original content word-for-word. The original content includes the entity '. So we should keep that exactly. However typical output would be the apostrophe. But to be safe, keep the entity.
2. "Old Mutual is a firm believer in the African opportunity and our diverse talent reflects this."
3. Then blank paragraphs (empty). We can ignore empty paragraphs? They are original content (empty). Should we preserve them? Probably we can ignore as they add no meaning. But preserving word-for-word would require empty tags. However we are to use for paragraphs; empty
would be okay but maybe we can omit them as they add no content. The rule "If text has no clear sections, just wrap paragraphs in
tags". Empty paragraphs could be considered paragraphs with no content; we could either keep them as
or drop them. I'd drop them to keep clean.
4. Then "Part-time opportunity:" This is a heading? Could be considered a section header. According to rules, we should use for section headers. So we wrap that text in Part-time opportunity:
. Keep the bold? The original had Part-time opportunity:. We should preserve the text "Part-time opportunity:" without the bold markup. So Part-time opportunity:
.
5. Then the list items: each
- content. We need to wrap the whole list in
- ... etc. The list items text:
- Part-time Financial Adviser
- Grade 12
- Currently in an existing role which he or she wants to retain, but supplement value proposition and/or income by offering financial advice
- Access to in-segment market and existing network
- DOFA/Fit & proper (note original had & which is HTML entity for &. We need to preserve that? The text "DOFA/Fit & proper". We'll keep the entity & as is.
- A valid Driver’s licence and own car (note the apostrophe in Driver’s is a curly apostrophe? We'll keep as is.)
- A clear criminal and credit check
- Proven computer literacy and digital dexterity
- Excellent communication skills (written and verbal)
- Sound planning and organising abilities
- Ability to collate, analyse and synthesize information
- Entrepreneurial mindset
- Sound business acumen
- GRIT, resilience and tenacity to stay the course.
- Sales orientation
We need to preserve exactly as given, including punctuation.
6. Then blank p.
7. Then "Skills" heading ->
Skills
8. Then blank p's.
9. Then the skills line: "Building Trust, Consultative Selling, Customer-Focused, Customer Service, Customer Understanding, Direct Selling, Identifying Sales Opportunities, Oral Communications, Probing Questions, Qualifying Prospects, Sales Data Management, Sales Software, Strategic Selling, Strengthening Customer Relationships"
We need to decide how to represent this. It's not a list; it's a sentence/comma-separated list. According to rules, we can wrap in as general text. So
Building Trust, Consultative Selling, Customer-Focused, Customer Service, Customer Understanding, Direct Selling, Identifying Sales Opportunities, Oral Communications, Probing Questions, Qualifying Prospects, Sales Data Management, Sales Software, Strategic Selling, Strengthening Customer Relationships
10. Then an empty . We can ignore as it's empty.
11. Then "Competencies" heading -> Competencies
12. Then blank p's.
13. Then the competencies text: It appears as a series of words each followed by empty tags. The text: "Action OrientedBalances StakeholdersBuilds NetworksCollaboratesCommunicates EffectivelyCustomer FocusDrives ResultsEnsures Accountability". So we need to output the text exactly, but we can strip the empty tags? If we preserve word-for-word, we must keep them. But they are empty tags; maybe we can keep them as . However the instruction says use for section headers, - for list items,
for paragraphs. It didn't forbid other tags, but we could keep them. However they are empty, so they'd produce nothing visually. Might be okay.
But maybe better to treat each competency as a list item? The original seems to be a list of competencies separated by empty h3 tags. Could be interpreted as each competency is a heading? But they used
as separators. Not clear.
Given the instruction to use for section headers and - for list items, we could treat the competencies as a list (
- Action Oriented
- Balances Stakeholders
... etc). That would be a reasonable semantic representation. However that would be adding structure (changing from original separators to list). The rule says preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. Changing the separators to list items is adding structure (though not adding or removing text). It's rephrasing? It's re-structuring but not changing text. Might be considered adding? Safer to keep the text as is, maybe wrap in and keep the empty
tags as they are. But the rule says no s, no
tags, but didn't forbid . So we could keep tags.
Thus after Competencies
, we could output the exact competency string: "Action OrientedBalances StakeholdersBuilds NetworksCollaboratesCommunicates EffectivelyCustomer FocusDrives ResultsEnsures Accountability". Then maybe a
after? Actually after that there is
etc. We'll just output that string as is, maybe inside a ? The original had that text directly after the blank p's, not inside a
tag? Let's see: after the blank p's, we have:
Competencies
Action OrientedBalances StakeholdersBuilds NetworksCollaboratesCommunicates EffectivelyCustomer FocusDrives ResultsEnsures Accountability
So the competency text is outside any tag, directly after the blank p's, then followed by a
. So we could wrap that competency text in a tag (as general text) and keep the inner
tags as they are. That would be adding a wrapper, which is allowed (we use
for paragraphs). It does not remove or add text, just adds a tag. That seems okay.
Thus we will output:
Action Oriented
Balances StakeholdersBuilds NetworksCollaboratesCommunicates EffectivelyCustomer FocusDrives ResultsEnsures Accountability
But note there is a trailing after the competency text. That's an empty p; we can ignore.
14. Then blank p's.
15. Then "Education" heading -> Education
16. Then the education line: "NQF Level 4 - Grade 12, School leaving Certificate, National or Occupational Certificate or equivalent". Note there are double spaces before "National". We'll preserve exactly.
Wrap in .
17. Then blank p.
18
. It didn't forbid other tags like
but we should not keep empty tags? It says preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. That suggests we must keep the exact text, including the empty tags? However we are to output HTML, and we can decide to keep them? The instruction: "Return ONLY the HTML. No markdown fences, no explanation, no preamble." It didn't say we must strip out empty tags. But earlier: "Use for section headers (e.g. Responsibilities, Qualifications, Requirements, Education, Experience, Skills, How to Apply, Key Duties, About the Role)". It didn't say we cannot use other tags, but we should follow the instruction: Use
for introductory paragraphs and general text,
for section headers, - for list items. It didn't forbid other tags, but to be safe we should convert section headers to
and maybe keep other tags as
? However the rule "Preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase" conflicts with changing tags. If we change
to something else, we are removing original tags. But maybe they mean preserve the textual content, not the markup. Usually in such tasks, they want you to strip away styling and produce semantic HTML with appropriate tags, but keep the text unchanged. The phrase "Preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase" likely refers to the textual content, not the markup. So we can change tags as needed, but keep the text exactly.
Thus we need to extract the textual content and wrap in appropriate tags.
Let's extract the text pieces:
1. "Let's Write Africa's Story Together!" (note the HTML entity ' is apostrophe). We need to output the actual apostrophe? The original text includes ' which is HTML entity for apostrophe. Preserving word-for-word would keep '? Usually they'd want the actual character? But we can keep as is? The instruction says preserve original content word-for-word. The original content includes the entity '. So we should keep that exactly. However typical output would be the apostrophe. But to be safe, keep the entity.
2. "Old Mutual is a firm believer in the African opportunity and our diverse talent reflects this."
3. Then blank paragraphs (empty). We can ignore empty paragraphs? They are original content (empty). Should we preserve them? Probably we can ignore as they add no meaning. But preserving word-for-word would require empty tags. However we are to use for paragraphs; empty
would be okay but maybe we can omit them as they add no content. The rule "If text has no clear sections, just wrap paragraphs in
tags". Empty paragraphs could be considered paragraphs with no content; we could either keep them as
or drop them. I'd drop them to keep clean.
4. Then "Part-time opportunity:" This is a heading? Could be considered a section header. According to rules, we should use for section headers. So we wrap that text in Part-time opportunity:
. Keep the bold? The original had Part-time opportunity:. We should preserve the text "Part-time opportunity:" without the bold markup. So Part-time opportunity:
.
5. Then the list items: each
- content. We need to wrap the whole list in
- ... etc. The list items text:
- Part-time Financial Adviser
- Grade 12
- Currently in an existing role which he or she wants to retain, but supplement value proposition and/or income by offering financial advice
- Access to in-segment market and existing network
- DOFA/Fit & proper (note original had & which is HTML entity for &. We need to preserve that? The text "DOFA/Fit & proper". We'll keep the entity & as is.
- A valid Driver’s licence and own car (note the apostrophe in Driver’s is a curly apostrophe? We'll keep as is.)
- A clear criminal and credit check
- Proven computer literacy and digital dexterity
- Excellent communication skills (written and verbal)
- Sound planning and organising abilities
- Ability to collate, analyse and synthesize information
- Entrepreneurial mindset
- Sound business acumen
- GRIT, resilience and tenacity to stay the course.
- Sales orientation
We need to preserve exactly as given, including punctuation.
6. Then blank p.
7. Then "Skills" heading ->
Skills
8. Then blank p's.
9. Then the skills line: "Building Trust, Consultative Selling, Customer-Focused, Customer Service, Customer Understanding, Direct Selling, Identifying Sales Opportunities, Oral Communications, Probing Questions, Qualifying Prospects, Sales Data Management, Sales Software, Strategic Selling, Strengthening Customer Relationships"
We need to decide how to represent this. It's not a list; it's a sentence/comma-separated list. According to rules, we can wrap in as general text. So
Building Trust, Consultative Selling, Customer-Focused, Customer Service, Customer Understanding, Direct Selling, Identifying Sales Opportunities, Oral Communications, Probing Questions, Qualifying Prospects, Sales Data Management, Sales Software, Strategic Selling, Strengthening Customer Relationships
10. Then an empty . We can ignore as it's empty.
11. Then "Competencies" heading -> Competencies
12. Then blank p's.
13. Then the competencies text: It appears as a series of words each followed by empty tags. The text: "Action OrientedBalances StakeholdersBuilds NetworksCollaboratesCommunicates EffectivelyCustomer FocusDrives ResultsEnsures Accountability". So we need to output the text exactly, but we can strip the empty tags? If we preserve word-for-word, we must keep them. But they are empty tags; maybe we can keep them as . However the instruction says use for section headers, - for list items,
for paragraphs. It didn't forbid other tags, but we could keep them. However they are empty, so they'd produce nothing visually. Might be okay.
But maybe better to treat each competency as a list item? The original seems to be a list of competencies separated by empty h3 tags. Could be interpreted as each competency is a heading? But they used
as separators. Not clear.
Given the instruction to use for section headers and - for list items, we could treat the competencies as a list (
- Action Oriented
- Balances Stakeholders
... etc). That would be a reasonable semantic representation. However that would be adding structure (changing from original separators to list). The rule says preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. Changing the separators to list items is adding structure (though not adding or removing text). It's rephrasing? It's re-structuring but not changing text. Might be considered adding? Safer to keep the text as is, maybe wrap in and keep the empty
tags as they are. But the rule says no s, no
tags, but didn't forbid . So we could keep tags.
Thus after Competencies
, we could output the exact competency string: "Action OrientedBalances StakeholdersBuilds NetworksCollaboratesCommunicates EffectivelyCustomer FocusDrives ResultsEnsures Accountability". Then maybe a
after? Actually after that there is
etc. We'll just output that string as is, maybe inside a ? The original had that text directly after the blank p's, not inside a
tag? Let's see: after the blank p's, we have:
Competencies
Action OrientedBalances StakeholdersBuilds NetworksCollaboratesCommunicates EffectivelyCustomer FocusDrives ResultsEnsures Accountability
So the competency text is outside any tag, directly after the blank p's, then followed by a
. So we could wrap that competency text in a tag (as general text) and keep the inner
tags as they are. That would be adding a wrapper, which is allowed (we use
for paragraphs). It does not remove or add text, just adds a tag. That seems okay.
Thus we will output:
Action Oriented
Balances StakeholdersBuilds NetworksCollaboratesCommunicates EffectivelyCustomer FocusDrives ResultsEnsures Accountability
But note there is a trailing after the competency text. That's an empty p; we can ignore.
14. Then blank p's.
15. Then "Education" heading -> Education
16. Then the education line: "NQF Level 4 - Grade 12, School leaving Certificate, National or Occupational Certificate or equivalent". Note there are double spaces before "National". We'll preserve exactly.
Wrap in .
17. Then blank p.
18
and maybe keep other tags as
? However the rule "Preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase" conflicts with changing tags. If we change
to something else, we are removing original tags. But maybe they mean preserve the textual content, not the markup. Usually in such tasks, they want you to strip away styling and produce semantic HTML with appropriate tags, but keep the text unchanged. The phrase "Preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase" likely refers to the textual content, not the markup. So we can change tags as needed, but keep the text exactly. Thus we need to extract the textual content and wrap in appropriate tags. Let's extract the text pieces: 1. "Let's Write Africa's Story Together!" (note the HTML entity ' is apostrophe). We need to output the actual apostrophe? The original text includes ' which is HTML entity for apostrophe. Preserving word-for-word would keep '? Usually they'd want the actual character? But we can keep as is? The instruction says preserve original content word-for-word. The original content includes the entity '. So we should keep that exactly. However typical output would be the apostrophe. But to be safe, keep the entity. 2. "Old Mutual is a firm believer in the African opportunity and our diverse talent reflects this." 3. Then blank paragraphs (empty). We can ignore empty paragraphs? They are original content (empty). Should we preserve them? Probably we can ignore as they add no meaning. But preserving word-for-word would require empty tags. However we are to usefor paragraphs; empty
would be okay but maybe we can omit them as they add no content. The rule "If text has no clear sections, just wrap paragraphs in
tags". Empty paragraphs could be considered paragraphs with no content; we could either keep them as
or drop them. I'd drop them to keep clean. 4. Then "Part-time opportunity:" This is a heading? Could be considered a section header. According to rules, we should use for section headers. So we wrap that text in Part-time opportunity:
. Keep the bold? The original had Part-time opportunity:. We should preserve the text "Part-time opportunity:" without the bold markup. So Part-time opportunity:
.
5. Then the list items: each
- ... etc. The list items text:
- Part-time Financial Adviser
- Grade 12
- Currently in an existing role which he or she wants to retain, but supplement value proposition and/or income by offering financial advice
- Access to in-segment market and existing network
- DOFA/Fit & proper (note original had & which is HTML entity for &. We need to preserve that? The text "DOFA/Fit & proper". We'll keep the entity & as is.
- A valid Driver’s licence and own car (note the apostrophe in Driver’s is a curly apostrophe? We'll keep as is.)
- A clear criminal and credit check
- Proven computer literacy and digital dexterity
- Excellent communication skills (written and verbal)
- Sound planning and organising abilities
- Ability to collate, analyse and synthesize information
- Entrepreneurial mindset
- Sound business acumen
- GRIT, resilience and tenacity to stay the course.
- Sales orientation
We need to preserve exactly as given, including punctuation.
6. Then blank p.
7. Then "Skills" heading ->
Skills
8. Then blank p's. 9. Then the skills line: "Building Trust, Consultative Selling, Customer-Focused, Customer Service, Customer Understanding, Direct Selling, Identifying Sales Opportunities, Oral Communications, Probing Questions, Qualifying Prospects, Sales Data Management, Sales Software, Strategic Selling, Strengthening Customer Relationships" We need to decide how to represent this. It's not a list; it's a sentence/comma-separated list. According to rules, we can wrap inas general text. So
Building Trust, Consultative Selling, Customer-Focused, Customer Service, Customer Understanding, Direct Selling, Identifying Sales Opportunities, Oral Communications, Probing Questions, Qualifying Prospects, Sales Data Management, Sales Software, Strategic Selling, Strengthening Customer Relationships
10. Then an empty . We can ignore as it's empty. 11. Then "Competencies" heading ->Competencies
12. Then blank p's. 13. Then the competencies text: It appears as a series of words each followed by empty tags. The text: "Action OrientedBalances StakeholdersBuilds NetworksCollaboratesCommunicates EffectivelyCustomer FocusDrives ResultsEnsures Accountability". So we need to output the text exactly, but we can strip the empty tags? If we preserve word-for-word, we must keep them. But they are empty tags; maybe we can keep them as . However the instruction says usefor section headers,
- for list items,
for paragraphs. It didn't forbid other tags, but we could keep them. However they are empty, so they'd produce nothing visually. Might be okay. But maybe better to treat each competency as a list item? The original seems to be a list of competencies separated by empty h3 tags. Could be interpreted as each competency is a heading? But they used
as separators. Not clear. Given the instruction to usefor section headers and
- for list items, we could treat the competencies as a list (
- Action Oriented
- Balances Stakeholders ... etc). That would be a reasonable semantic representation. However that would be adding structure (changing from original separators to list). The rule says preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. Changing the separators to list items is adding structure (though not adding or removing text). It's rephrasing? It's re-structuring but not changing text. Might be considered adding? Safer to keep the text as is, maybe wrap in
and keep the empty
tags as they are. But the rule says nos, no
tags, but didn't forbid. So we could keep tags. Thus after
Competencies
, we could output the exact competency string: "Action OrientedBalances StakeholdersBuilds NetworksCollaboratesCommunicates EffectivelyCustomer FocusDrives ResultsEnsures Accountability". Then maybe aafter? Actually after that there is
etc. We'll just output that string as is, maybe inside a? The original had that text directly after the blank p's, not inside a
tag? Let's see: after the blank p's, we have:
Competencies
Action OrientedBalances StakeholdersBuilds NetworksCollaboratesCommunicates EffectivelyCustomer FocusDrives ResultsEnsures Accountability So the competency text is outside anytag, directly after the blank p's, then followed by a
. So we could wrap that competency text in atag (as general text) and keep the inner
tags as they are. That would be adding awrapper, which is allowed (we use
for paragraphs). It does not remove or add text, just adds a tag. That seems okay. Thus we will output:
Action Oriented
Balances StakeholdersBuilds NetworksCollaboratesCommunicates EffectivelyCustomer FocusDrives ResultsEnsures Accountability But note there is a trailing after the competency text. That's an empty p; we can ignore. 14. Then blank p's. 15. Then "Education" heading ->Education
16. Then the education line: "NQF Level 4 - Grade 12, School leaving Certificate, National or Occupational Certificate or equivalent". Note there are double spaces before "National". We'll preserve exactly. Wrap in. 17. Then blank p. 18
- for list items, we could treat the competencies as a list (
- for list items,
How well do you match?
Get an instant AI match score for this role — free, takes 3 minutes.
Tailor your CV for this role
The concierge rewrites your whole CV and writes a matching cover letter for this job — opens right here, nothing to paste.
Tailor My CV to This Job ✍️Free cover letter for this job
Upload your CV and get a tailored cover letter in seconds — free, no account needed.
Generate a Cover Letter 📝Let jobs find you
Leave your email and our AI matches you to new jobs across 24 African markets — free. You wait for the call.
Add your CV for real matches
Upload your CV and we score every new job against your real experience — only strong matches reach your inbox. Optional, but it makes your matches far sharper.
You're in.
We'll email you the moment a job matches your profile. Check your inbox for a welcome from My Job Concierge.
I'm ECHO, your MJC career assistant. I can help you find jobs, explore career tools, and connect with opportunities across Africa.